1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829 |
- --- transproxy-1.6.orig/tproxyrun 2004-03-31 14:19:34.000000000 +0200
- +++ transproxy-1.6/tproxyrun 2012-10-24 09:06:52.000000000 +0200
- @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ Linux)
- # I really have no idea about Linux, are these kernel versions correct
- # for the type if network filtering supported? Is there a surefire way?
- case `uname -r` in
- - 2.[3456789].*)
- + 3.*|2.[3456789].*)
- iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d localhost --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
- iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d "$HOSTNAME1" --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
- if [ -n "$HOSTNAME2" ]; then
- @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ if [ -n "$FORCE_URL" ]; then
- fi
-
- # Start transproxy running.
- -/usr/local/sbin/tproxy -s "$TRANSPROXYPORT" -d $CMD "$PROXYNAME" "$PROXYPORT"
- +/usr/sbin/tproxy -s "$TRANSPROXYPORT" -d $CMD "$PROXYNAME" "$PROXYPORT"
-
- # Remove the filter rules.
- case `uname` in
- @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ FreeBSD)
- ;;
- Linux)
- case `uname -r` in
- - 2.[3456789].*)
- + 3.*|2.[3456789].*)
- iptables -t nat -D PREROUTING -p tcp -d localhost --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
- iptables -t nat -D PREROUTING -p tcp -d "$HOSTNAME1" --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
- if [ -n "$HOSTNAME2" ]; then
|