nptl: fix a few more old style declerations

Signed-off-by: Austin Foxley <austinf@cetoncorp.com>

libpthread/nptl/pthreadP.h

@@ -263,13 +263,11 @@ hidden_proto (__nptl_death_event)
 #ifdef TLS_MULTIPLE_THREADS_IN_TCB
 extern void __libc_pthread_init (unsigned long int *ptr,
 				 void (*reclaim) (void),
-				 const struct pthread_functions *functions)
-     internal_function;
+				 const struct pthread_functions *functions);
 #else
 extern int *__libc_pthread_init (unsigned long int *ptr,
 				 void (*reclaim) (void),
-				 const struct pthread_functions *functions)
-     internal_function;
+				 const struct pthread_functions *functions);
 
 /* Variable set to a nonzero value if more than one thread runs or ran.  */
 extern int __pthread_multiple_threads attribute_hidden;

libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/libc_pthread_init.c

@@ -34,10 +34,10 @@ extern int __libc_multiple_threads attribute_hidden;
 
 int *
 #endif
-__libc_pthread_init (ptr, reclaim, functions)
-     unsigned long int *ptr;
-     void (*reclaim) (void);
-     const struct pthread_functions *functions;
+__libc_pthread_init (
+     unsigned long int *ptr,
+     void (*reclaim) (void),
+     const struct pthread_functions *functions)
 {
   /* Remember the pointer to the generation counter in libpthread.  */
   __fork_generation_pointer = ptr;

libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/register-atfork.c

@@ -78,11 +78,11 @@ fork_handler_alloc (void)
 
 
 int
-__register_atfork (prepare, parent, child, dso_handle)
-     void (*prepare) (void);
-     void (*parent) (void);
-     void (*child) (void);
-     void *dso_handle;
+__register_atfork (
+     void (*prepare) (void),
+     void (*parent) (void),
+     void (*child) (void),
+     void *dso_handle)
 {
   /* Get the lock to not conflict with other allocations.  */
   lll_lock (__fork_lock);

libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/unregister-atfork.c

@@ -24,8 +24,7 @@
 
 
 void
-__unregister_atfork (dso_handle)
-     void *dso_handle;
+__unregister_atfork (void *dso_handle)
 {
   /* Check whether there is any entry in the list which we have to
      remove.  It is likely that this is not the case so don't bother