 Mike Frysinger
|
1a03bbc7f7
update copyright with glibc
|
19 years ago |
 Peter S. Mazinger
|
9e2b0f0f80
even the hidden version of the weaks in libc (as strong in libpthread) have to be weaks
|
19 years ago |
|
Mike Frysinger
|
b7f5cf144f
create local prototype for __libc_sigaction
|
19 years ago |
|
Peter S. Mazinger
|
9b92b36b83
make sigaction/raise/sigwait/siglongjmp/longjmp weak_alias, these are in libpthread as well
|
19 years ago |
|
Peter S. Mazinger
|
0d212a2b26
make gcc4 happy w/ hidden_def/proto, correct some typos
|
19 years ago |
|
Mike Frysinger
|
c55044b05f
dont hide __libc_sigaction
|
19 years ago |
|
Peter S. Mazinger
|
af0172162f
hidden_def/hidden_proto: convert all users (I hope) termios split, add some missing headers, other jump relocs removed
|
19 years ago |
|
Mike Frysinger
|
42853c3205
sync with glibc
|
19 years ago |
 "Steven J. Hill"
|
7e3edddc72
Merge from NPTL branch.
|
19 years ago |
|
Peter S. Mazinger
|
121d3f0fa2
Try to mimic glibc sigaction, sjhill, could you please test w/ this version?
|
19 years ago |
|
Peter S. Mazinger
|
c885bf5cf9
More hiding, including __mempcpy
|
19 years ago |
|
Peter S. Mazinger
|
8a0b43005a
Hide mostly used functions
|
19 years ago |
|
Mike Frysinger
|
f6677b70e1
update licenses and sync with glibc
|
19 years ago |
 Eric Andersen
|
9febc84ad3
Update sigaction syscall names to act more like glibc. Fix the x86 sigaction
|
22 years ago |
|
Eric Andersen
|
49bf4a5a4c
Looks like sigaction on arm needs adjustment, so split this into
|
22 years ago |
|
Eric Andersen
|
d6abdce959
Use sizeof(sa_mask) instaed of sizeof(sigset_t) since sa_mask is
|
23 years ago |
|
Eric Andersen
|
3ab0557e5a
A number of naming updates in preparation for adding in
|
23 years ago |
|
Eric Andersen
|
f3aece684d
HAVE_SA_RESTORER is supposed to be true, not false, on most arches.
|
23 years ago |
|
Eric Andersen
|
c1bb4ddffb
Fix a few things I'd missed when using old (2.0.x) kernels.
|
23 years ago |
|
Eric Andersen
|
b88ff80f70
Once again, rework the signal handling to be even more correct. We no
|
23 years ago |
