.. |
alpha
|
94fa1bb40f
use the __extern_always_inline define from cdefs.h instead of duplicating gcc version checking in every pt-machine.h header ... while __extern_always_inline should work fine, i think what is intended is __extern_inline ... should double check later
|
il y a 17 ans |
arm
|
94fa1bb40f
use the __extern_always_inline define from cdefs.h instead of duplicating gcc version checking in every pt-machine.h header ... while __extern_always_inline should work fine, i think what is intended is __extern_inline ... should double check later
|
il y a 17 ans |
avr32
|
94fa1bb40f
use the __extern_always_inline define from cdefs.h instead of duplicating gcc version checking in every pt-machine.h header ... while __extern_always_inline should work fine, i think what is intended is __extern_inline ... should double check later
|
il y a 17 ans |
cris
|
94fa1bb40f
use the __extern_always_inline define from cdefs.h instead of duplicating gcc version checking in every pt-machine.h header ... while __extern_always_inline should work fine, i think what is intended is __extern_inline ... should double check later
|
il y a 17 ans |
hppa
|
94fa1bb40f
use the __extern_always_inline define from cdefs.h instead of duplicating gcc version checking in every pt-machine.h header ... while __extern_always_inline should work fine, i think what is intended is __extern_inline ... should double check later
|
il y a 17 ans |
i386
|
94fa1bb40f
use the __extern_always_inline define from cdefs.h instead of duplicating gcc version checking in every pt-machine.h header ... while __extern_always_inline should work fine, i think what is intended is __extern_inline ... should double check later
|
il y a 17 ans |
ia64
|
94fa1bb40f
use the __extern_always_inline define from cdefs.h instead of duplicating gcc version checking in every pt-machine.h header ... while __extern_always_inline should work fine, i think what is intended is __extern_inline ... should double check later
|
il y a 17 ans |
m68k
|
94fa1bb40f
use the __extern_always_inline define from cdefs.h instead of duplicating gcc version checking in every pt-machine.h header ... while __extern_always_inline should work fine, i think what is intended is __extern_inline ... should double check later
|
il y a 17 ans |
mips
|
94fa1bb40f
use the __extern_always_inline define from cdefs.h instead of duplicating gcc version checking in every pt-machine.h header ... while __extern_always_inline should work fine, i think what is intended is __extern_inline ... should double check later
|
il y a 17 ans |
powerpc
|
94fa1bb40f
use the __extern_always_inline define from cdefs.h instead of duplicating gcc version checking in every pt-machine.h header ... while __extern_always_inline should work fine, i think what is intended is __extern_inline ... should double check later
|
il y a 17 ans |
pthread
|
c8141d994e
Peter Mazinger pointed out that my last commit was faulty.
|
il y a 18 ans |
s390
|
94fa1bb40f
use the __extern_always_inline define from cdefs.h instead of duplicating gcc version checking in every pt-machine.h header ... while __extern_always_inline should work fine, i think what is intended is __extern_inline ... should double check later
|
il y a 17 ans |
sh
|
94fa1bb40f
use the __extern_always_inline define from cdefs.h instead of duplicating gcc version checking in every pt-machine.h header ... while __extern_always_inline should work fine, i think what is intended is __extern_inline ... should double check later
|
il y a 17 ans |
sparc
|
94fa1bb40f
use the __extern_always_inline define from cdefs.h instead of duplicating gcc version checking in every pt-machine.h header ... while __extern_always_inline should work fine, i think what is intended is __extern_inline ... should double check later
|
il y a 17 ans |
unix
|
18c2b10552
remove redundant headers local to libpthread, causing header
|
il y a 18 ans |
x86_64
|
94fa1bb40f
use the __extern_always_inline define from cdefs.h instead of duplicating gcc version checking in every pt-machine.h header ... while __extern_always_inline should work fine, i think what is intended is __extern_inline ... should double check later
|
il y a 17 ans |